The village of Waunakee plans to give some of its residents up to $10,000 to fix their homes.
The program will start taking applications in October for matching grants of between $2,000 and $10,000 for home-improvement projects worth at least $4,000, according to Waunakee planning director Tim Semmann. Eligible homeowners can make no more than $71,179, or 60% of the area’s median income of $118,631.
Funding for the program, which amounts to about $159,000, comes from an extension of one of the village’s tax incremental financing, or TIF, districts, Semmann said.
TIF is a tool commonly used by municipal governments to attract business development by leveraging anticipated increases in property taxes, but can also be used to improve or attract housing, said Todd Schmidt, Waunakee village administrator.
In hopes of keeping the fund solvent beyond its pilot year, the Village Board also approved an extension of a second TIF district — a move that could provide another $775,000 if the program attracts enough applicants, Semmann said.
People are also reading…
He said that, under state of Wisconsin law, 75% of the money generated by extending a TIF district must be used for affordable housing.
The fund is intended to help maintain the village’s stock of affordable housing, particularly in older neighborhoods with single- and two-family homes, Schmidt said. Dane County and much of the rest of the country continue to face a shortage of affordable homes.
The fund first stemmed from recommendations of an affordable housing task force the village created in 2019, Schmidt said, and is modeled after a similar program in the city of Menasha.
Who’s eligible
In addition to its income and project-cost requirements, the program is limited to owner-occupied one- or two-family homes assessed at no more than 125% of the village’s median home value.
There are no limits on how old a home can be to receive the funds, Semmann said. In fact, the older the home, the higher the likelihood the property owner will get a grant, he said.
Properties whose owners are delinquent on any debts to the village, that are owned in part or in whole by a tax-exempt entity, or that have open code violations will not be eligible, according to the village. Properties can only be eligible for a grant once every five years.
“Housing is a big need in Dane County,” Semmann said. “Given increasing material and labor costs in the recent past, an opportunity to help offset those costs should provide some degree of relief.”
Cities With the Most Recently-Built Homes
Cities With the Most Recently-Built Homes
Photo Credit: pbk-pg / Shutterstock
The last two years have shown that the stock of housing in the U.S. is inadequate for the country’s needs. Fast-rising home prices and rents nationwide illustrate that supply has failed to keep up with housing demand. Experts at federal mortgage backer Freddie Mac estimate that the U.S. is nearly 4 million housing units short of what the population needs.
But another challenge is that America’s housing stock is getting older. Today, the median age of a housing unit in the U.S. is 42 years, a figure that has risen steadily over the last two decades. And many older homes are located in places where population growth is flat or slower than in other parts of the country. The result is an imbalance between the locations where housing is more plentiful or affordable and the locations where people are trying to live.
And older homes can have additional downsides. While some residents appreciate the period charms of an older home, these homes tend to have more maintenance problems and lower energy efficiency, which can raise costs of ownership. They are also more likely to have used dangerous materials like asbestos, lead paint, or radon, which create health risks.
Fewer than 20 percent of US homes were built in 2000 or later
One primary reason for both the shortage and aging of America’s housing stock is the collapse of the building industry after the Great Recession. From 2000 to 2009, when the housing boom reached its peak, new construction kept pace with historical levels as builders added nearly 19 million new homes in that decade. But when the bubble burst and the recession set in at the end of the decade, the rate at which the U.S. added housing fell off dramatically. Since 2010, the U.S. has added only 8.6 million new housing units.
The consequences of underbuilding have played out dramatically over the last two years. With too few homes on the market, competition for residential real estate has been high. Home values have skyrocketed since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the median sales price in the U.S. up by more than one-third since 2020. In turn, these increases have priced more prospective buyers out of the market, which has left more people competing for rentals and driving prices higher there as well.
Newer homes are more expensive to buy and rent
Newer homes already tend to be more expensive because they have more desirable modern designs, amenities, and materials, so people are willing to pay higher home values and rents to live in these units. A unit built after 2014 sells for more than 15% higher and rents for 13% higher than a home built just a few years prior, from 2010 to 2013. With construction costs increasing, the gap could widen in future years.
Southern and Mountain states have the most recently built homes
Parts of the Northeast and Midwest which have been heavily populated for longer tend to have older housing stock, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. New York leads the nation in residential home age with a median age of 63 years, followed by nearby Rhode Island and Massachusetts at 59 years. At the other end of the spectrum, states in the Mountain West and Southeast, which have been growing quickly in recent years, have younger housing stock overall. Nevada (26 years) leads all states with the newest housing, with states like Arizona, Utah, South Carolina, and Georgia not far behind.
Fast-growing Sun Belt cities offer the most recently-built housing at the metro level, and cities in two states stand out: North Carolina and Texas. North Carolina’s two largest metros, Raleigh and Charlotte, are each in the top three cities with the most new homes, while the Lone Star State is home to four of the top 15.
The data used in this analysis is from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (2020). To determine the locations with the most recently-built homes, researchers at Inspection Support Network calculated the median residential home age as of 2020, the most recent data available. Locations with lower home ages were ranked higher. In the event of a tie, the location with the greater share of housing units built in 2014 or later was ranked higher.
Here are the U.S. cities with the most recently-built homes.
Small and midsize cities with the most recently built homes
15. El Paso, TX
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 38 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 5.3%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 13,291
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +8.1%
14. Nashville-Davidson, TN
Photo Credit: Steve Heap / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 38 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 8.6%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 26,713
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +13.5%
13. Virginia Beach, VA
Photo Credit: John S. Quinn / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 37 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 2.9%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 5,345
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +3.4%
12. Phoenix, AZ
Photo Credit: Gregory E. Clifford / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 37 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 2.9%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 18,482
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +14.4%
11. Arlington, TX
Photo Credit: Peter Witham / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 36 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 1.7%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 2,458
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +10.5%
10. Aurora, CO
Photo Credit: Jacob Boomsma / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 36 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 4.3%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 5,917
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +20.8%
9. Colorado Springs, CO
Photo Credit: photo.ua / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 36 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 4.6%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 8,934
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +16.8%
8. Jacksonville, FL
Photo Credit: Ramunas Bruzas / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 36 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 4.6%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 17,808
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +11.2%
7. Mesa, AZ
Photo Credit: Tim Roberts Photography / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 33 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 4.9%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 10,512
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +15.8%
6. Bakersfield, CA
Photo Credit: Matt Gush / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 32 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 4.8%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 6,051
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +14.5%
5. Fort Worth, TX
Photo Credit: Timothy Milan Kuret / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 32 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 7.1%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 24,050
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +26.5%
4. Austin, TX
Photo Credit: Ryan Conine / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 31 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 9.0%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 38,301
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +26.4%
3. Charlotte, NC
Photo Credit: digidreamgrafix / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 29 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 6.8%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 24,990
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +23.8%
2. Las Vegas, NV
Photo Credit: f11photo / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 27 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 3.1%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 7,964
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +11.2%
1. Raleigh, NC
Photo Credit: Farid Sani / Shutterstock
- Median residential home age: 27 years
- Share of housing units built in 2014 or later: 7.9%
- Total housing units built in 2014 or later: 16,237
- Change in population in the last 10 years: +22.7%
Why aren't developers building condos in Madison?
